Disable Preloader

CaseLaw

Adizua Vs. Isubua (1993) CLR 2(o) (CA)

Judgement delivered on 9th February, 1993

Brief

  • Chieftaincy matter
  • Right of appeal
  • Right of action
  • S.16 Court of Appeal Act

Facts

The respondent was plaintiff in Suit No. HOG/22/25 at the Oguta High Court. The appellant was the defendant. The respondent's claims were for:

  • 1
    "A declaration that under the native law and custom of Nmahu, Egbema, the plaintiff is the head of Umuafokita village of Nmahu, Egbema, and consequently entitled to all the rights, privileges and obligations associated with the headship.
  • 2
    An injunction restraining the defendant from carrying himself out as. or acting as or performing any of the functions of the head of Umuafokita village. Nmahu, Egbema and from enjoying any rights privileges and obligations associated with the headship."

After due trial, the trial Judge granted all the claims.

Aggrieved by the decision, the applicant appealed to the Court of Appeal.

The appeal was still pending in the Court of Appeal when the respondent was reported dead. Sequel to the death of the respondent, and still desirous of prosecuting his appeal, the appellant filed an application to substitute one Joshua Okanne for the deceased respondent. There was no evidence that the said Joshua Okanne himself did indicate personal interest in the stoolship subject-matter of the suit or make any pretence about his entitlement to it.

In the affidavit in support of the application, the applicant claimed, inter alia, that by tradition he was the oldest man in Umuafokita village and consequently the village head but that the party sought to be joined and who was next to him in age was an "Oloru" (a non indigene or stranger) like the deceased respondent and should never become the village head and that in the event of his (applicant's) death, the issue will still arise, so that it is better that the appeal be determined on the merit.

Issues

Whether Joshua Okanne can properly be...

Read More